Organizers and Partners

Deadlines IT @ 2012

30-09-2011 - Abstract Submission 

19-10-2011 - Announcement of the Nominees
14-12-2011 - MindByte Submission 
04-01-2012 - Workbench Submission
18-01-2012 - MindByte Presentations
19-01-2012 - Workbench Presentations

Supporting Organisations

        

WEDNESDAY, 18 JANUARY 2012

 

  • 08:00 - 10:30 Registration, Coffee and Networking
  • 10:30 - 11:00 Opening Ceremony
  • 11:00 - 13:00 MindByte Presentations – Round 1
  • ...

 

See the full programme here

EVENT REVIEW 2011

In this edition you will find a comprehensive review of this year’s event including details of all the IT@2011 nominees and finalists. There are also extended articles from the top three projects, as voted for by the audience and expert panel of judges.

Multimedia

IT@Networking 2011
Find pictures and
videos from the
2011 event

Media Partners

Presentation Criteria

SUBMISSION, PRESENTATION AND VOTING

In order to ensure cross-departmental understanding IT @ 2012 requires each submission to answer the following questions below. After each presentation and Q&A session the audience and expert judges (CEOs, CIOs, CMIOs, hospital and IT managers, radiologists, policy makers, physicians) will cast  their vote according to this structure: 
 

PRESENTATION/VOTING CRITERIA

1. THE IMPORTANCE OF TECHNOLOGY
What technology was used and how was it integrated into the workplace?


2. BENEFITS
Has the project helped those it was designed to help?
Has the project changed how tasks are performed?
What new advantages or opportunities does the project provide?


3. ORIGINALITY
What makes the solution special?
Are there any original features?
Is it the first, the only, the best or the most effective application of its kind?
Is it an improvement on existing implementations?


4. DIFFICULTY
What important obstacles had to be overcome?
Were there any technical or organisational problems?


5. SUCCESS
Has the project achieved or exceeded its goals?
How do you see the project’s success affecting other applications, your facility or other organisations?
How quickly would the users accept the implications of this innovation?


6. IMPACT
What is your overall impression of the project?